ArticleCureus2026
Hyperbilirubinemia as an Indicator of Complicated Appendicitis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliable preoperative identification of complicated appendicitis may support appropriate selection for operative or non-operative pathways. This study evaluated admission total serum bilirubin as an adjunctive marker of complicated disease and compared its performance with white blood cell count (WBC).
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 150 patients who underwent appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Cairo University Hospital over six months. Operative findings classified cases as negative appendicectomy, uncomplicated appendicitis, or complicated appendicitis. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed among patients with operative appendicitis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to select thresholds based on the maximum Youden index. Exact Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
resultsOf 150 participants, 35 (23.3%) had a macroscopically normal appendix, 86 (57.3%) had uncomplicated appendicitis, and 29 (19.3%) had complicated appendicitis. For complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis, total bilirubin had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.904 (bootstrap 95% CI 0.827-0.968; P < 0.001). At a threshold of ≥0.95 mg/dL, sensitivity was 82.76% (95% CI 64.23%-94.15%), specificity 94.19% (86.95%-98.09%), PPV 82.76% (64.23%-94.15%), and NPV 94.19% (86.95%-98.09%). WBC had an AUC of 0.717 (95% CI 0.596-0.826; P < 0.001); at ≥14.3 x 10⁹/L, sensitivity was 72.41% and specificity 76.74%.
conclusionAdmission total serum bilirubin showed good discrimination for complicated appendicitis in this single-center operative cohort and performed better than WBC alone. It should be interpreted as an adjunct to clinical assessment and imaging, and the identified threshold requires independent validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.