ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Can Chemoradiotherapy Expand Immune Checkpoint Blockade Responsiveness in Mismatch Repair-Proficient Rectal Cancer?
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has transformed the treatment of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer but produces no meaningful benefit in advanced mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, however, pathological responses have been reported in a subset of pMMR tumors, suggesting that clinical context modifies apparent ICB sensitivity. In pMMR rectal cancer, adding ICB to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been associated with pathological complete response (pCR) rates of 30% or more in several trials, higher than expected with CRT alone. These data are clinically provocative, particularly because sustained clinical complete response (cCR) may support watch-and-wait, but pCR and cCR remain early endpoints; long-term disease control and organ-preservation safety remain insufficiently defined. Whether CRT induces ICB responsiveness remains unresolved. The increase in pCR with sequential PD-1 blockade after CRT provides a clinical signal for testing this possibility, but pCR cannot distinguish CRT-induced ICB responsiveness from the simple additive effects of CRT and ICB. Pretreatment T-cell-inflamed features are candidate enrichment markers, but none is validated for patient selection. Priorities are therefore to compare biomarkers associated with ICB responsiveness before and after CRT within the same patients and prospectively validate selection assays. Long-term follow-up must determine whether treatment-induced increases in pCR are accompanied by better disease control and whether organ preservation after sustained cCR is safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.