ArticleJournal of medicine and life2026
Expanding prenatal diagnosis: clinical utility of prenatal whole-exome sequencing in a Romanian case series with fetal anomalies.
Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prenatal diagnostic field is rapidly expanding internationally, creating a growing need for guidelines and for a better understanding of the clinical utility of new tests across different clinical settings. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) and to assess its clinical utility and impact on outcomes among families with high-risk pregnancies and the multidisciplinary teams supervising the cases. We retrospectively reviewed indications, fetal phenotypes, results, turnaround time, and the clinical impact of WES in 10 pregnancies from the Romanian population, investigated in a private clinical diagnostic laboratory between January 2024 and March 2026. The diagnostic yield of prenatal WES was 50% in this case series of Romanian pregnancies with ultrasound-detected malformations and a previous negative microarray result. Seven out of ten patients opted for medical termination of pregnancy. Our findings are consistent with those of other national and international studies, while highlighting the need for improved clinical pathways and guidelines to support appropriate test selection and prenatal management. The multidisciplinary team considered prenatal WES an efficient tool for prenatal diagnosis, with potential to inform pregnancy management, including the choice of maternity hospital level, delivery planning, and personalized neonatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.