ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting non-complete response after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Non-complete response after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) has been associated with poor prognosis. We compared clinical, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics models for predict non-complete response of the primary tumor, and estimated each data type's marginal contribution across all configurations. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 88 patients (67 complete and 21 non-complete responders) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT and multi-parametric MRI. Models were optimized under nested leave-one-out cross-validation across 366 configurations spanning imbalance handling, feature selection, and classifier. Each data type's marginal contribution was estimated as the mean paired AUC difference versus a parsimonious clinical model. Early and late fusion were tested, and clinical utility was assessed by exploratory decision curve analysis. Results: In a best-configuration comparison, the MRI model achieved the highest discrimination (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-0.98) but did not significantly outperform the parsimonious clinical model (AUC 0.75, DeLong Conclusions: A properly specified clinical model was a strong benchmark for radiomics. Single-best pipeline results can overstate radiomic value in small cohorts, and biascontrolled evaluation with external validation is essential before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.