ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Anatomy-Driven Aesthetic Design for Facial Contouring in Northeast Asian Females: A Conceptual Framework and Case Report.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial filler contouring is commonly planned within a volume-centric framework emphasizing product selection and localized augmentation. Although widely used, such approaches may not always clearly separate material selection from aesthetic design intent or fully incorporate population-specific anatomical characteristics, particularly in Northeast Asian faces. This proof-of-concept case report proposes an anatomy-informed, design-oriented conceptual framework that prioritizes whole-face contour continuity and anatomically appropriate pathways over isolated volumetric correction. A population-contextualized Reference Facial Form is introduced as a qualitative design reference from which aesthetic intent is translated into geometric principles and subsequently into predefined vectors. In this framework, vectors are structured cannula-based trajectories defined by specific entry points, advancement directions, withdrawal pathways, and deep anatomical planes. Procedural planning is guided by predefined procedural conditions-including anatomical entry points, vector orientation, and relative filler distribution within deep planes-rather than primarily by fixed injection volumes. The framework is illustrated through a single two-stage clinical case. The initial stage used an off-label diluted polycaprolactone-based admixture to establish broad deep-plane structural support, followed by selective contour refinement with hyaluronic acid fillers after initial stabilization. Early clinical images illustrated the correspondence between the planned vectors and early contour formation but were not suitable for establishing treatment efficacy or durability. The available follow-up was also insufficient to establish long-term safety. Fifteen de-identified supplementary cases constituted a criterion-defined consecutive illustrative series demonstrating recurrent vector and entry-point patterns across similar anatomical contexts; they were not analyzed as a validation or outcome cohort. By framing facial filler contouring as a design-first process, this framework may provide a conceptual language for clinical planning and education. Its clinical efficacy, inter-operator reproducibility, generalizability, and long-term safety require evaluation in larger, systematically designed studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.