ArticleJPRAS open2026
Tangential excision of rhinophyma with electrocautery and healing by secondary intention: A case report.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhinophyma is a benign, slowly progressive, disfiguring condition of the nose characterized by sebaceous gland hypertrophy, fibrosis, and follicular plugging, generally regarded as the end stage of phymatous rosacea. It predominantly affects middle-aged to elderly men and can cause significant cosmetic and psychosocial morbidity and, in advanced cases, nasal airway obstruction. We report a 71-year-old hypertensive man who presented with progressive, painless nasal enlargement involving the nasal tip and alar crests bilaterally. Incisional biopsy confirmed rhinophyma, showing sebaceous hyperplasia with cystic dilatation of the follicular infundibula and keratinous plugging. He underwent tangential excision using a cold blade combined with monopolar electrocautery, with hemostasis achieved by monopolar diathermy, and the wound was left to heal by secondary intention under a silver-based dressing. Healing was uneventful, with complete re-epithelialization and a satisfactory cosmetic outcome. This case supports tangential excision with monopolar electrocautery as a simple, effective, and reproducible technique for rhinophyma. Beyond the outcome itself, this report documents the intraoperative depth-control and symmetry cues used, the technical difficulties encountered during subunit contouring, and a staged postoperative wound-care protocol, so that an established but often summarily described technique can be reproduced in centres without access to laser or hydrosurgical platforms. A single case cannot establish superiority over alternative modalities, and comparative studies using standardized aesthetic outcome measures remain needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.