Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751260›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2026

"The Most Difficult Conversations We Have": Resident Experiences With Pediatric Neuroprognostication.

Grant L Lin, Beatrice D White, Shelby D Burk, Jessica A Moriarty, David B Mauser, Claire E Wakefield, Courtney J Wusthoff, Justin N Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Grant L LinDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-2140
Beatrice D WhiteDivision of Quality of Life and Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics Stanford University and Stanford Medicine Children's Health Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8627-3316
Shelby D BurkDivision of Quality of Life and Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics Stanford University and Stanford Medicine Children's Health Stanford California USA.
Jessica A MoriartyDivision of Quality of Life and Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics Stanford University and Stanford Medicine Children's Health Stanford California USA.
David B MauserDivision of Quality of Life and Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics Stanford University and Stanford Medicine Children's Health Stanford California USA.
Claire E WakefieldDivision of Quality of Life and Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics Stanford University and Stanford Medicine Children's Health Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-7067
Courtney J WusthoffDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology University of California-Davis Davis California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1882-5567
Justin N BakerDivision of Quality of Life and Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics Stanford University and Stanford Medicine Children's Health Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6584-6483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric neuroprognostication is often complicated by uncertainty and embedded in high-stakes medical decisions. For child neurology residents, participation in neuroprognostication can represent key learning experiences but also comes with emotional and ethical challenges, which poses a risk of moral distress. This study sought to describe contextual influences and impacts on residents participating in neuroprognostication. Methods: One-on-one, semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted with senior (postgraduate year 5-6) child neurology residents. Deidentified transcripts were iteratively analyzed to develop themes and generate a narrative of resident experiences. Initial themes were shared with participants for additional feedback. Final themes were synthesized to characterize contextual influences and the emotional and professional impacts of participating in neuroprognostication. Results: Fifteen residents from 12 institutions across 10 states participated, representing a range of program sizes and geographic locations across the United States. Qualitative analysis identified five themes: (1) Conclusions: Residents describe neuroprognostication as an emotionally salient experience carrying a strong sense of responsibility. This narrative highlights opportunities to support residents in training, improve prognostic communication, and address potential threats to resident well-being.

Indexed as

moral distressneuroprognosticationresident educationserious illness communicationuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42751260
PMCPMC13580348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.