ArticleBrain & spine2026
Laser disc decompression in the management of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Laser therapy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive treatment option for managing pain and improving function in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Yet, the efficacy of laser therapy across different treatment modalities remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of various laser therapy modalities and explores their potential application across patient subgroups. Method: A systematic review was conducted, screening 19,644 studies. A total of 31 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, with 10 included in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled standardized mean changes (SMCs) for each modality. Heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: The pooled SMC across 2 modalities was 2.32 (95% CI: -0.75, 5.39), indicating a point estimate suggestive of a large effect but with extreme imprecision and uncertainty, as the CI crossed the line of no effect. Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) had a larger effect size (SMC = 3.54, 95% CI: -2.87 to 9.94) compared to epidural laser disc decompression (ELDD) (SMC = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.67 to 2.33). Qualitative findings indicated that both low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and high intensity laser therapy (HILT) may also effectively reduce Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Conclusion: This study suggests that laser therapy may reduce postoperative pain and improve functional status in patients with LDH, although evidence regarding consistent reduction in disc herniation size remains limited. However, significant heterogeneity, methodological inconsistency, and low study power were present among the included studies. PLDD showed the highest pooled effect size among all laser therapies. Future work should compare laser therapy and surgical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.