Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751245›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2026

Laser disc decompression in the management of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abith G Kamath, Saran S Gill, Sahil Ravisangar, Hasan Zaidi, Srihan Yalavarthy, Ahkash Thavarajasingam, Sreeraag Kanakala, Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah, Ahmed Salih, Isha Vanza and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abith G KamathImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Saran S GillImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sahil RavisangarImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hasan ZaidiImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Srihan YalavarthyImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahkash ThavarajasingamImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sreeraag KanakalaImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hariharan Subbiah PonniahImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahmed SalihImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Isha VanzaImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vritika RavisangarImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Santhosh G ThavarajasingamDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Srikar R NamireddyImperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Laser therapy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive treatment option for managing pain and improving function in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Yet, the efficacy of laser therapy across different treatment modalities remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of various laser therapy modalities and explores their potential application across patient subgroups. Method: A systematic review was conducted, screening 19,644 studies. A total of 31 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, with 10 included in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled standardized mean changes (SMCs) for each modality. Heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: The pooled SMC across 2 modalities was 2.32 (95% CI: -0.75, 5.39), indicating a point estimate suggestive of a large effect but with extreme imprecision and uncertainty, as the CI crossed the line of no effect. Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) had a larger effect size (SMC = 3.54, 95% CI: -2.87 to 9.94) compared to epidural laser disc decompression (ELDD) (SMC = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.67 to 2.33). Qualitative findings indicated that both low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and high intensity laser therapy (HILT) may also effectively reduce Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Conclusion: This study suggests that laser therapy may reduce postoperative pain and improve functional status in patients with LDH, although evidence regarding consistent reduction in disc herniation size remains limited. However, significant heterogeneity, methodological inconsistency, and low study power were present among the included studies. PLDD showed the highest pooled effect size among all laser therapies. Future work should compare laser therapy and surgical approaches.

Indexed as

Epidural Laser Disc Decompression (ELDD)Laser disc decompressionLumbar disc herniationMinimally invasive spine surgeryPercutaneous Laser Disc Decompression (PLDD)Systematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID42751245
PMCPMC13580072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.