Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751224›Full record

ArticleGlobal epidemiology2026

Targeted HIV testing modalities in Zimbabwe: Achieving effectiveness through a revised model.

Hamufare Dumisani Mugauri, Owen Mugurungi, Joconiah Chirenda, Kudakwashe Takarinda, Mufuta Tshimanga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamufare Dumisani MugauriThe University of Zimbabwe, Global, Public Health and Family Medicine Department, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Owen MugurungiMinistry of Health and Childcare, AIDS and TB Unit, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Joconiah ChirendaThe University of Zimbabwe, Global, Public Health and Family Medicine Department, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kudakwashe TakarindaOrganisation for Public Health Interventions and Development (OPHID), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Mufuta TshimangaThe University of Zimbabwe, Global, Public Health and Family Medicine Department, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: HIV testing remains central to epidemic control, but awareness of HIV status in Zimbabwe remains below UNAIDS targets. We evaluated a targeted HIV testing model using a risk-screening tool to triage clients for same-day provider-initiated HIV testing, while routing screen-negative clients to HIV self-testing. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods implementation evaluation across eight provinces from April 2021 to June 2022. Thirteen candidate screening questions were evaluated in 7825 clients and reduced to five domains for assessment of the final combined rule in 2116 complete-case assessment records. The rule screened clients last tested at least 3 months previously, or never tested, who reported at least one additional risk or symptom criterion. We also conducted 20 healthcare-worker interviews and reconstructed the index-testing cascade for 6308 index cases. Results: The final combined rule achieved 94.1% sensitivity, 19.5% specificity, 9.2% positive predictive value, 97.4% negative predictive value, 18.0% testing volume reduction, and a number needed to test of 11. In the index-testing cascade, 66.4% of index cases were offered partner testing; 5080 contacts were elicited, 78.6% were tested, 43.5% tested HIV positive, and 91.8% initiated antiretroviral therapy. Positivity was associated with anonymous tracing (aOR 8.46, 95% CI 3.37-22.75), ≤7-day testing (2.78, 2.44-3.18), male sex (3.09, 2.74-3.49), and first-time testing (1.65, 1.43-1.91). Conclusion: The targeted model maintained high screening sensitivity while modestly reducing same-day provider-initiated testing volume, and index testing achieved high positivity and ART linkage among tested contacts. The screening rule should be interpreted as a triage mechanism rather than a diagnostic discriminator, while implementation of the broader model requires timely contact tracing, differentiated testing options, and reliable linkage systems.

Indexed as

HIV self-testingHIV testingIndex testingLinkageProvider-initiated testingRisk screeningZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID42751224
PMCPMC13579930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.