ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Learning to support client autonomy during clinical nursing training: an exploratory qualitative descriptive study.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Supporting clients' autonomy in daily living care is vital for dignity and quality of life. In practice, autonomy is often conflated with self-reliance; however, whereas self-reliance concerns performing activities independently, autonomy concerns making decisions according to one's own values and preferences. Little is known about how nursing students learn to support clients' autonomy during clinical training. Aim: We explored how nursing students learn to support clients' autonomy through interactions with clinical supervisors during clinical training. Methods: In an exploratory qualitative descriptive study guided by an interpretivist orientation (May-June 2024), we investigated how nursing students learned to support clients' autonomy through 25 non-participant observations in clinical practice and 22 follow-up semi-structured interviews with students ( Results: Autonomy-supportive behaviour was present in practice, although it varied across situations and was not always applied. Supervisors and students often interpreted autonomy support as promoting self-reliance rather than supporting clients' preferences and participation in decision-making. While some supervisors explicitly taught autonomy support through demonstration, feedback, and reflection, these learning opportunities were inconsistent. Consequently, students mainly learned implicitly by observing and imitating supervisors, who acted as role models during everyday care. Conclusions: Autonomy support was rarely made explicit and was frequently confused with self-reliance. Consequently, students' learning opportunities were inconsistent and largely implicit. To better support patient autonomy in nursing and community care in the Netherlands, we suggest that supervisors should be supported in making autonomy-supportive practices and their underlying reasoning explicit through structured reflection. In addition, educational programs and practice settings should consider collaborating to develop structured learning opportunities focused on autonomy support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.