Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751180›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Using Landsat, Sentinel-1 and -2 and GEE to assess changes in wetland Ecosystem Functional Groups in the Maputaland Coastal Plain of South Africa.

Philani Apleni, Laven Naidoo, Philemon Tsele, Heidi van Deventer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philani ApleniDepartment of Geography, Geoinformatics & Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.
Laven NaidooDepartment of Geography, Geoinformatics & Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.
Philemon TseleDepartment of Geography, Geoinformatics & Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.
Heidi van DeventerDepartment of Geography, Geoinformatics & Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent monitoring of wetland Ecosystem Functional Groups (EFGs) over large areas and long periods remains challenging owing to uneven availability, varying spatial resolutions, and spectral similarity of some EFGs. A Google Earth Engine (GEE)-based Earth Observation workflow was developed to map and quantify changes in wetland EFGs across the Maputaland Coastal Plain (MCP) in South Africa. The study included Landsat imagery for 1990, 2000, 2006 and 2014; and Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery for 2018, 2020 and 2022. The methods involved:•Data collection of historical desktop datasets and in-field validation of seven wetland EFG types;•Multiple spectral indices derived from the images were combined with topographical variables and elevation data derived from a Digital Terrain Model, as well as desktop and in-field-collected data points in a classification algorithm;•Recursive feature elimination was used to select the most informative predictors; and•The use of a Random Forest machine learning algorithm and recursive feature elimination for the classifications in GEE.Changes in EFGs were quantified between 1990 and 2022. The classification algorithm can be used recursively, while only the input point datasets should be iteratively validated using fine-scale spatial-resolution data, such as aerial or orthophotos, or in-field validation. The methods improved the delineation of the seven wetland EFGs compared to other datasets and contributed to the Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) assessment of the EFGs.

Indexed as

Earth ObservationGlobal Biodiversity Framework (GBF)Google Earth Engine (GEE)Random ForestRemote Sensing

Identifiers

PMID42751180
PMCPMC13579318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.