Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751172›Full record

ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2026

Ultrasound Education for Medical Students: Principles, Training Approaches, and Current Controversies.

Yung-Liang Wan, Johannes Weimer, Kwok-Yin Leung, Christian Jenssen, Kathleen Möller, Nasenien Nourkami-Tutdibi, Florian Recker, Christoph Frank Dietrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yung-Liang Wan *Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3039-996X
Johannes Weimer *Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3759-8176
Kwok-Yin LeungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gleneagles Hospital, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Christian JenssenBrandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical University, Neuruppin, Brandenburg, Germany.
Kathleen MöllerMedical Department I/Gastroenterology, SANA Hospital Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9492-0141
Nasenien Nourkami-TutdibiSaarland University Medical Center, Hospital of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Homburg/Saar, SL, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, NW, Germany.
Christoph Frank DietrichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, HE, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-6347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical ultrasound is an essential diagnostic modality that requires both theoretical knowledge and practical skills. In undergraduate medical education, ultrasound training involves not only image acquisition but also a fundamental understanding of anatomy, physiology, ultrasound physics, instrumentation, and clinical interpretation. The aim of this article is to provide a structured overview of the key principles relevant to undergraduate ultrasound education and to discuss current controversies in curriculum design. This narrative educational review synthesizes existing literature, guideline recommendations, and perspectives from the Student Ultrasound Education (SUSE) initiative to outline essential learning objectives and core components of training. Fundamental concepts including ultrasound physics, the piezoelectric effect, probes, imaging modes, and basic system controls ("knobology") are summarized. Standard scanning techniques, probe manipulation, image resolution, and common artifacts are explained with emphasis on their relevance for clinical practice. The review also addresses reporting standards, terminology, ergonomics, hygiene, quality assurance, and safety aspects such as adherence to the ALARA principle. In addition, current debates in ultrasound education are discussed, including the timing of training within the curriculum, the role of simulation, the use of handheld devices, and the integration of digital learning tools and artificial intelligence. Overall, structured and longitudinal ultrasound education that integrates theoretical foundations with supervised clinical practice is essential for preparing medical students for responsible use of ultrasound in clinical care.

Indexed as

controversiescurriculum developmentknobologypoint-of-care ultrasoundquality assurancesimulation-based trainingstudent ultrasound educationultrasound physicsultrasound safetyundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID42751172
PMCPMC13579781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.