ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Neuroinflammation in postoperative cognitive dysfunction: the multi-target potential of esketamine in modulating microglial responses and synaptic integrity.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remains a clinically important problem after surgery, particularly in older and neurologically vulnerable patients. Its interpretation is complicated by heterogeneous cognitive definitions and follow-up periods, while the underlying biology appears to involve interacting inflammatory, metabolic, glial, and synaptic disturbances rather than a single pathogenic cascade. Esketamine has therefore attracted interest as a potential perioperative neuroprotective agent, but the strength of evidence differs markedly across the mechanisms proposed to explain its effects. We conducted a structured narrative review with evidence mapping of clinical and experimental studies identified in PubMed/MEDLINE and the Web of Science Core Collection, using a literature cutoff of 1 May 2026. Direct perioperative clinical and preclinical studies were distinguished from non-perioperative esketamine research, ketamine/enantiomer studies, and contextual POCD/PND biology, with greater mechanistic weight assigned to experiments incorporating pathway perturbation or rescue. The direct preclinical literature favors a multi-branch model of esketamine action. Functional evidence supports contributions from TLR4/MyD88-p38 signaling, STING/TBK1-associated inflammatory cell death, and PARP1-related autophagic regulation, while changes in NF-κB signaling, microglial BDNF-TrkB activity, and ROCK2/ADD1-associated synaptic remodeling are supported mainly by convergent molecular and functional findings. NLRP3 remains relevant to postoperative neuroinflammation but has not been established as a required upstream mediator of esketamine action, and proposed effects on the blood-brain barrier, antioxidant pathways, cholinergic signaling, and neurogenesis remain less directly supported in perioperative cognitive models. Clinical findings are less uniform. Some randomized trials suggest reductions in postoperative delirium or early postoperative cognitive decline in selected populations, whereas other adequately designed studies are neutral, and evidence for sustained cognitive protection is limited. Peripheral inflammatory, neuronal-injury, and neurotrophic biomarkers indicate biological activity but do not establish central target engagement or cognitive mediation. Taken together, the current literature supports a biologically plausible, multi-target model for esketamine, but not an established preventive effect against perioperative neurocognitive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.