Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42751129›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Bringing usability testing to the front lines: IV smart pump evaluation with critical care nurses at a national conference.

Brenda Abena Nyarko, Seonhun Lee, Gina L Georgadarellis, Frank C Sup Iv, Karen K Giuliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brenda Abena NyarkoElaine Marieb Center for Nursing and Engineering Innovation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Seonhun LeeElaine Marieb Center for Nursing and Engineering Innovation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Gina L GeorgadarellisElaine Marieb Center for Nursing and Engineering Innovation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Frank C Sup IvElaine Marieb Center for Nursing and Engineering Innovation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Karen K GiulianoElaine Marieb Center for Nursing and Engineering Innovation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous smart pump (IVSP) usability evaluations are often conducted in single-site laboratory or simulation settings, which can limit access to experienced frontline nurses. This methods article describes a field-deployable, conference-based approach for evaluating IVSP usability with practicing critical-care nurses. The method brought a standardized simulation environment to a national critical-care nursing conference while preserving experimental control through consistent pump stations, scripted clinical scenarios, counterbalanced device order, and common data-collection procedures. The approach integrates direct observation of programming performance with wearable eye tracking, physiologic monitoring, subjective workload ratings, healthcare-specific usability assessment, think-aloud comments, and device preference ranking. The method is intended for researchers, health systems, manufacturers, and nurse-engineer teams seeking a scalable way to evaluate bedside technologies with intended users. • Adapts traditional laboratory-based usability testing into a portable, conference-based method. • Combines standardized clinical tasks with multimodal measures of visual attention, workload, usability, and performance. • Provides a reproducible framework for evaluating medical-device usability with frontline clinicians.

Indexed as

Conference-based recruitmentEye trackingHuman factorsInfusion technologyIV smart pumpsNurse-device interactionSubjective workloadUsability testing

Identifiers

PMID42751129
PMCPMC13579674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.