ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2026
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in transplantation surgery care pathway.
Review in World journal of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly applied across the transplantation pathway, offering advances in preoperative planning, perioperative management, and postoperative recovery. In preoperative care, deep learning algorithms improve anatomical assessment, volumetry, and graft weight estimation, while ML-based functional status evaluation and urgency scoring refine candidate selection. Predictive models incorporating metabolic and physiological data further support surgical eligibility and targeted prehabilitation strategies. Perioperatively, ML models outperform conventional approaches in predicting massive transfusion, intraoperative haemorrhage, and acute kidney injury, with explainable outputs enhancing interpretability and clinical trust. Robotic and AI-assisted surgical platforms demonstrate functional equivalence or superiority to conventional methods, reducing intraoperative complications and accelerating recovery, particularly in high-risk cohorts. Postoperatively, ML-driven models enable early prediction of sepsis, pneumonia, and graft dysfunction, while longitudinal markers such as the recipient-to-donor estimated glomerular filtration rate ratio and novel imaging or biomarker-based approaches inform long-term graft monitoring. Optimised perioperative strategies, including analgesic regimens and fluid management, further enhance donor recovery and rehabilitation outcomes. Cross-cutting innovations include imaging-based AI applications such as hyperspectral imaging for real-time graft viability assessment and deep learning for automated histopathological evaluation, which improve diagnostic speed, accuracy, and reproducibility. Multimodal models integrating electronic health records, intraoperative signals, ultrasound, and histology provide dynamic, system-wide insights into graft function and rejection risk, bridging diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decision-making. AI and ML thus hold substantial potential to personalise transplant care and improve outcomes. Their translation into practice, however, requires rigorous validation, dataset diversity, and strong ethical and regulatory governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.