ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026
Exposure of unmonitored workers to ionizing radiation due to portable X-ray machine use and area dose mapping in an emergency department in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To quantify the exposure of unmonitored workers to radiation and perform dose mapping in selected emergency room (ER) department areas during portable X-ray examinations at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over a 3-week period in the ER at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah. In total, 39 unmonitored healthcare workers comprising 18 nurses and 21 respiratory therapists (RTs) were monitored using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters. Additional OSL dosimeters were placed in fixed ER locations to assess scattered radiation in selected areas. Net badge values were obtained after subtracting available baseline or background readings before annualization. Annualization was conducted to allow comparisons with previous studies that reported annual dose estimates. Results: The mean estimated annualized worker dose was 0.50 ± 0.21 mSv/year for nurses and 0.40 ± 0.30 mSv/year for RTs, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( Conclusion: In the present study, measurable but modest annualized dose estimates were found in unmonitored workers and similarly low annualized area dose estimates in monitored ER locations. These findings support the value of periodic local dose audits, staff education, reinforcement of safe positioning during portable imaging, and continued monitoring to strengthen radiation protection practice in emergency care settings. These estimates were derived based on a relatively short monitoring period, so they should be interpreted with appropriate caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.