ArticleHealth science reports2026
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (P-CASP). Methods: In this cross-sectional psychometric study, 136 individuals with stroke and 60 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Translation and cultural adaptation followed the Beaton and Dewey protocol. Content validity was assessed using CVR and CVI based on ratings from 20 experts. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation with the MMSE, and known-groups validity was examined by comparing stroke and control groups. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 76 participants over 2 weeks. Internal consistency was estimated using Guttman's lambda-2 ( Results: CVR and CVI ranged from 0.70 to 1.00 and 0.95-1.00, respectively. P-CASP scores correlated strongly with MMSE scores ( Conclusion: The P-CASP demonstrated strong validity, high internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability, and good discriminative performance. It may provide a practical cognitive assessment tool for individuals with stroke, including those with aphasia. Further factor-analytic and longitudinal studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.