ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2026
Altered Hierarchical Visual Rhythm Tracking in Early Deafness.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhythm perception enables humans to navigate dynamic environments. The auditory system is particularly adept at processing rhythmic temporal structure, and auditory training exerts a greater influence than visual training on visual rhythm perception, leading to the hypothesis that auditory coding may support visual rhythm representation. This raises a fundamental question: whether and to what extent the deprivation of auditory coding capabilities influences visual rhythm processing. To investigate this issue, we assessed cortical tracking of hierarchical visual rhythms in hearing and early deaf participants using electroencephalography (EEG). Participants viewed 2 types of rhythmic sequences: geometric shapes and point-light walkers. Each stimulus type consists of a lower-order basic rhythm defined by stimulus recurrence and a higher-order chunk rhythm built on perceptual or cognitive organization. Results showed that hearing participants exhibited robust cortical tracking of both basic and chunk rhythms across stimuli. In contrast, deaf participants exhibited preserved tracking of basic rhythms but reduced tracking of chunk rhythms. Moreover, compared with the hearing group, the deaf group showed reduced visual-auditory and visual-frontal functional connectivity, and individual differences in connectivity strength were positively correlated with chunk-rhythm tracking. These findings support a hierarchical auditory scaffolding framework, in which auditory experience is selectively associated with higher-order visual rhythm perception through temporal chunking mechanisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.