Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42750816›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2027

Prostate and pelvic SABR with or without a focal boost: results from a multicenter phase II prospective clinical trial.

Yasir Alayed, Darin Gopaul, Lucas C Mendez, Winkle Kwan, Stanley K Liu, William Chu, Chia-Lin Tseng, Patrick Cheung, Danny Vesprini, Hans Chung and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yasir AlayedDivision of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Darin GopaulGrand River Regional Cancer Center, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Lucas C MendezLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Winkle KwanBC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada.
Stanley K LiuSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
William ChuDurham Regional Cancer Centre, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Chia-Lin TsengSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patrick CheungSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Danny VespriniSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hans ChungSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gerard MortonSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rohan CorreaSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bindu MusunuruDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Melanie DavidsonBC Cancer, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Ananth RaviToronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea DeabreuSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexander MamedovSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Evan PoonSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Liying ZhangSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew LoblawSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Given the complexity of SABR to the pelvis in prostate cancer (PCa), it was important to establish the safety and feasibility in a multicentric setting. We report the outcomes of a multicenter, phase II study of SABR with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and an optional prostate focal boost. Methods: Patients had unfavorable-intermediate or high-risk PCa. All patients received 5 fractions SABR weekly delivering 25Gy ENI and 40Gy to prostate simultaneously, with an optional 50Gy focal prostate boost. All patients had ADT. Primary endpoint was acute GI and GU adverse events (AE). Results: 76 patients were accrued at 4 hospitals with a median follow-up of 62.8 months. 63% of patients had high-risk PCa. 41% of patients had a focal boost. Acute grade ≥ 2 GI and GU AE was 4.1% and 18%. At 5 years, 2.9% and 4.3% of patients had grade 2 GI and GU AE, and no grade 3+ GI/GU AE was observed at the last follow-up. 5-year cumulative biochemical failure was 10.5%. The median PSA nadir was 0.2 ng/mL. 84% of patients recovered their testosterone level, with a median time of 14.3 months. 2.9%, 5.9% and 4.6% of patients had a large change in QOL (SD*2) in the EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual domains. Conclusions: 5-fraction SABR to prostate and pelvis for unfavorable-risk PCa was safe and feasible in a multicentric setting with or without a focal boost. There were few significant AE, encouraging PSA kinetics and biochemical control. The results are currently being validated in randomized trials.

Indexed as

focal boostprostate cancerquality of lifestereotactic ablative radiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID42750816
PMCPMC13577878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.