ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2027
Prostate and pelvic SABR with or without a focal boost: results from a multicenter phase II prospective clinical trial.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Given the complexity of SABR to the pelvis in prostate cancer (PCa), it was important to establish the safety and feasibility in a multicentric setting. We report the outcomes of a multicenter, phase II study of SABR with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and an optional prostate focal boost. Methods: Patients had unfavorable-intermediate or high-risk PCa. All patients received 5 fractions SABR weekly delivering 25Gy ENI and 40Gy to prostate simultaneously, with an optional 50Gy focal prostate boost. All patients had ADT. Primary endpoint was acute GI and GU adverse events (AE). Results: 76 patients were accrued at 4 hospitals with a median follow-up of 62.8 months. 63% of patients had high-risk PCa. 41% of patients had a focal boost. Acute grade ≥ 2 GI and GU AE was 4.1% and 18%. At 5 years, 2.9% and 4.3% of patients had grade 2 GI and GU AE, and no grade 3+ GI/GU AE was observed at the last follow-up. 5-year cumulative biochemical failure was 10.5%. The median PSA nadir was 0.2 ng/mL. 84% of patients recovered their testosterone level, with a median time of 14.3 months. 2.9%, 5.9% and 4.6% of patients had a large change in QOL (SD*2) in the EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual domains. Conclusions: 5-fraction SABR to prostate and pelvis for unfavorable-risk PCa was safe and feasible in a multicentric setting with or without a focal boost. There were few significant AE, encouraging PSA kinetics and biochemical control. The results are currently being validated in randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.