Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42750792›Full record

ArticleApplied spatial analysis and policy2025

Comparing Machine Learning-Based Crime Predictions Across Micro-Geographic Units: Street Segments, Rectangular Grids, and Hexagonal Grids.

Robin Khalfa, Wim Hardyns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied spatial analysis and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robin KhalfaGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wim HardynsGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the potential of alternative micro-geographic units of analysis compared to the widely used rectangular grid for predicting (monthly) micro-geographic crime risks using a machine learning approach. Specifically, this study compares the prediction performance of machine learning models (XGBoost) in deriving monthly micro-geographic risk predictions for three crime types across rectangular and hexagonal grids of varying resolutions, as well as street segments, using the hit rate, precision, and F1-score as key performance measures. Police-registered data on residential burglary, aggressive theft, and battery (2013-2018), along with environmental and seasonal data on crime predictors were used to train the models and evaluate their performance across different units of analysis and performance measures. Results show that street segments generally achieve higher hit rates compared to grid-based units, but only marginally when compared to high-resolution grids (0.0025 km²). This study thus finds no clear advantage of street segments over small grids in terms of model hit rate. In addition, using street segments and small grids comes at the cost of lower model precision, resulting in more false positive predictions. Grids with resolutions from 0.04 km² to 0.25 km² offer a more balanced performance. Further, no substantial differences were found between rectangular and hexagonal grids, indicating grid shape does not affect prediction performance. Future work should explore how model performance should be defined and operationalised within the context predicting crime risks at specific micro-geographic levels and what the implications are of employing specific micro-geographic units of analysis within the context of crime prevention. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-025-09683-1.

Indexed as

Crime predictionGrid cellsMachine learningMicro-geographic unitsSpatial analysisStreet segments

Identifiers

PMID42750792
PMCPMC13578039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.