ArticleJournal of reliable intelligent environments2026
Privacy-aware adversarial defense with explainable AI for adversarial robustness in AI model.
Article in Journal of reliable intelligent environments, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AI models in critical sectors such as healthcare and finance must provide both data privacy and adversarial robustness. Differential Privacy (DP) protects training data by injecting noise, but this noise smooths decision boundaries and leaves models open to adversarial evasion, a tension known as the Privacy-Robustness Trade-off. Although this trade-off is well documented, its internal mechanism remains underexplored: prior work does not reveal how the noise reshapes a model's reasoning or which features become vulnerable. To close this gap, we propose a Privacy-Aware Adversarial Defense grounded in Explainable AI. Specifically, we introduce the Attention Concentration Score (ACS), which measures how DP training shifts Transformer attention away from task-critical features toward non-functional ones. This attention drift correlates with adversarial vulnerability, providing a mechanistic explanation of the trade-off. Building on this insight, we develop a Manifold-Aligned Semantic Attack that targets the most drifted features, and a TrustScore defense that fuses embedding-level anomaly detection with attention-level consistency checks. We validate across two datasets (Adult Census, MIMIC-IV), two architectures (DeBERTa-V3-Large, LLaMA-3.1-8B), and seven experiments benchmarking five attacks against six defenses. Within the recommended range (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.