Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42750450›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026

Functional neurological disorder, suggestion and virtual reality: neuroanatomical and computational perspectives.

Quinton Deeley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Quinton DeeleyCultural and Social Neuroscience Research Group, King's College London , London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-0769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Opinion piece addresses links between functional neurological disorder, hypnosis and suggestion, and their potential modulation by virtual reality (VR) in neuroanatomical and computational terms. The cortical hierarchy provides an anatomical basis for differing neurocognitive and computational theories applied to suggested effects and functional symptoms-hierarchical predictive coding, top-down cortical feedback and signal routing, and attractor dynamics. Each theory views the brain as a graded anatomical hierarchy with bidirectional influences between levels. Each considers that representations privileged by heightened attention (whether by cognitive control or automatic processes) alter the pre-conscious 'editing' of experience to generate suggested effects and functional symptoms. This occurs through an increase in top-down signals relative to bottom-up signals across the cortical hierarchy, resulting in enhanced activation of selected neuronal populations in intermediate levels. This alters the interpretation of bottom-up signals or radically misrepresents the presence or absence of bottom-up signals to higher levels. By contrast, VR influences experience by simulating the bottom-up effects of veridical sensory input to sensory processing streams. Despite the shared framework of the cortical hierarchy, the theories differ in important respects. Implications for future research and combining suggestions and VR to treat functional symptoms are considered. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Digital healthcare for the management of functional neurological disorders'.

Indexed as

BrainHypnosisNervous System DiseasesVirtual RealityHumansNeuroanatomyattractor dynamicsbraincortical hierarchyfunctional neurological disorderhierarchical predictive codinghypnosissuggestionvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42750450
PMCPMC13644782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.