ArticleCancer medicine2026
Inclusion of Multi-Omic Biomarkers Improves Prediction Accuracy of Response, Relapse, and Overall Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Receiving High-Intensity Induction Chemotherapy.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite advancements in genetic markers for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk stratification, outcome prediction remains challenging due to disease heterogeneity and dynamic genetic changes, highlighting the need for reliable biomarkers to improve AML treatment strategies and patient outcomes. To refine outcome predictions, we investigated the use of microbial-derived biomarkers to predict composite complete remission (CRc), relapse, and survival for patients on high- and low-intensity regimens, and to integrate those variables into the widely clinically utilized European Leukemia Network (ELN-2022) genetic risk classification model for high-intensity-treated patients.
methodsWe first developed machine learning models that integrate baseline fecal metabolomics, 16S rRNA-based stool microbiome features, and clinical metadata (sex, antibiotic administration, AML somatic mutations, and cytogenetics) from two cohorts of AML patients (n = 83) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy. Univariate tests and sparse canonical correlation analysis were employed for variable selection and to explore fecal metabolite-microbe relationships. A robust machine learning approach using XGBoost was employed, with 100 stratified data splits (80% training, 20% testing) and coarse-to-fine hyperparameter optimization. Variable importance was aggregated across all models to select key predictors.
resultsFor high-intensity-treated patients, XGBoost models achieved aggregated AUROC scores of 0.719, 0.729, and 0.65 for CRc, relapse, and overall survival, respectively. For low-intensity-treated patients, these models achieved aggregate AUROC scores of 0.945, 0.724, and 0.768 for these same outcomes, respectively. Integrating the biomarkers identified in the high-intensity machine-learning models with the current ELN-2022 AML risk stratification system effectively stratified patients into risk categories, which obtained higher concordance indices and likelihood ratios, demonstrating improved prognostic accuracy for each outcome compared to ELN-2022 alone.
conclusionsThe inclusion of microbial-derived biomarkers serves as a robust prognostic tool to improve outcome prediction in AML patients, highlighting the potential of its integration into AML risk assessment and paving the way for personalized treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.