Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42750157›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2026

Not All Children Are the Same: Differences in the Microbiome Assembly During Early Development of Seaweeds.

Syukur Syukur, Jadranka Nappi, Marwan E Majzoub, Torsten Thomas, Suhelen Egan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Syukur SyukurCentre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5635-1354
Jadranka NappiCentre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4998-8799
Marwan E MajzoubHost-Microbiome Interaction Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6461-8211
Torsten ThomasCentre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-3001
Suhelen EganCentre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-4279

Funding

Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial symbionts play key roles in macroalgal development, yet the processes structuring early-life microbiomes remain poorly understood. Using laboratory outgrowth experiments and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing we compared microbiome acquisition and assembly during the early development of three distinct macroalgae: Ulva australis (Chlorophyta), Hormosira banksii (Phaeophyceae) and Delisea pulchra (Rhodophyta). All species established distinct bacterial communities within the first week of outgrowth, with significant shifts in community composition and structure associated with major developmental stages. Stage-enriched taxa included Phaeobacter, Roseobacter and Maribacter, which include members reported to influence algal growth or morphogenesis. Vertical inheritance contributed unevenly to the microbiome assembly across hosts. U. australis recruited low-abundance environmental bacteria, possibly via strong host filtering. H. banksii selectively retained a small, consistent subset of adult-derived bacteria, whereas D. pulchra retained fewer of its inherited bacteria. These results suggest that macroalgae can employ diverse transmission and recruitment strategies to assemble early microbiomes, combining selective inheritance with stage-specific retention and/or environmental acquisition.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaPhaeophyceaeRhodophytaSeaweedUlvaChlorophytaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisRNA, Ribosomal, 16Smacroalgaemarine microbiologymicrobial inheritancemicrobial symbiosismicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID42750157
PMCPMC13583033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.