Trial reportThe oncologist2026
Preventive effect of goshajinkigan on paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: an open-label, randomized phase II study (OLCSG2101).
Trial report in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel (PTX)-containing regimens, and no preventive strategy has been established. We evaluated goshajinkigan (GJG), a traditional Japanese herbal medicine (Kampo), for preventing CIPN during PTX-containing chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this open-label, randomized phase II trial across 7 institutions in Japan, patients with malignant tumors scheduled for ≥4 courses of carboplatin plus PTX (≥150 mg/m²) were randomized 1:1 to GJG or control, with minimization by cancer type and age. The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 CIPN incidence within 4 courses. The protocol-prespecified primary analysis used an unstratified 2-sided log-rank test (α = 0.10); a supportive stratified analysis accounted for the minimization factors.
resultsSixty-five patients were randomized (GJG, 32; control, 33); 52 (80.0%) had lung cancer. Grade ≥2 CIPN occurred in 28.1% (9/32) of the GJG arm vs 51.5% (17/33) of the control arm; the protocol-prespecified unstratified log-rank P value was .013, with a corresponding HR of 0.34 (90% CI, 0.16-0.72). In the stratified analysis accounting for cancer type and age, the estimate remained in favor of GJG but was attenuated and less precise (HR, 0.48; 90% CI, 0.22-1.02; stratified log-rank P = .101). Grade 3-5 adverse-event incidence was similar between arms.
conclusionGJG was associated with fewer grade ≥2 CIPN events in this predominantly lung-cancer population. Given the open-label design and uncertainty in the stratified analysis, these findings represent a phase II preventive signal warranting confirmation in a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs061210047).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.