Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42750135›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Engineering Borophene Band Structure Through Thickness.

Matteo Jugovac, Marcin Szpytma, Tevfik Onur Menteş, Andrea Locatelli, Iulia Cojocariu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo JugovacIstituto di Struttura della Materia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9525-3980
Marcin SzpytmaFaculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Kraków, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2615-0854
Tevfik Onur MenteşElettra Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A., Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-9272
Andrea LocatelliElettra Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A., Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8072-7343
Iulia CojocariuDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6408-3541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Borophene, the 2D allotrope of boron, exhibits electronic properties that strongly depend on the supporting substrate and film thickness. Understanding how interlayer and substrate interactions jointly regulate borophene's electronic properties remains a key challenge for the future exploitation of this emerging material. Here, monolayer and bilayer borophene are synthesized on W(110) to probe thickness-induced changes in their band structure. In situ low-energy electron microscopy and diffraction, combined with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, reveal distinct borophene-derived valence-band fingerprints for the two thicknesses. While the monolayer adopts an ordered, epitaxial arrangement with substrate-hybridized metallic states, the bilayer exhibits reduced visibility of these substrate-hybridized features, long-range order, and distinct valence-band states. These results reveal a thickness-induced electronic reorganization governed by structural reconstruction and interlayer interactions that accompany the formation of the second boron layer, which collectively shape the band structure of this emerging material.

Indexed as

boropheneelectronic structurehybridizationinterface engineeringinterfacial couplinglayer‐dependent properties

Identifiers

PMID42750135
PMCPMC13583102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.