ArticleTropical medicine and health2026
Tigecycline versus doxycycline for scrub typhus: a preliminary randomized trial.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07513103 (Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Drug Use Tigecycline for Re-creation of Antimicrobial Agents for Treatment of Scrub Typhus.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Drug Use Tigecycline for Re-creation of Antimicrobial Agents for Treatment of Scrub Typhus.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDoxycycline is the standard treatment for scrub typhus, but evidence regarding parenteral alternatives remains limited in hospitalized patients. MAIN BODY: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial in Korea. Participants were enrolled and randomized from November 2022 through December 6, 2024. Adults aged 19 years or older hospitalized with clinically suspected scrub typhus were randomized to intravenous tigecycline or oral doxycycline; all randomized participants were subsequently laboratory-confirmed by PCR and/or seroconversion on paired serologic testing. Tigecycline was given as a 100 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg every 12 h for 5 days; doxycycline was given as 100 mg every 12 h for 7 days. The primary outcome was time from first dose to body temperature <37.3 °C sustained for at least 48 consecutive hours without antipyretics. Of 27 randomized patients, 24 were included in the per-protocol efficacy analysis. Median time to defervescence was shorter with tigecycline than with doxycycline (16.6 h [interquartile range, 11.0-32.0] vs. 55.0 h [24.0-64.3]; P = 0.0079). No recurrence requiring additional antirickettsial therapy occurred within 30 days. One patient in each group reported nausea.
conclusionsIn this preliminary randomized trial, intravenous tigecycline was associated with faster defervescence than oral doxycycline in clinically stable hospitalized adults with scrub typhus. These findings support further evaluation of tigecycline as an intravenous option in selected patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07513103.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.