Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42750051›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2026

Tigecycline versus doxycycline for scrub typhus: a preliminary randomized trial.

Jae Hyoung Im, Sukbin Jang, Young Ju Suh, DaeHyung Lee, Kwang Jun Lee, Jonghyun Kim, Se Ju Lee, Ji Hyeon Baek, Young Kyoung Park, EunJi Kim and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07513103 (Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Drug Use Tigecycline for Re-creation of Antimicrobial Agents for Treatment of Scrub Typhus.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07513103 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Drug Use Tigecycline for Re-creation of Antimicrobial Agents for Treatment of Scrub Typhus.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJin Soo LeeRan2022 to 2025Enrolled27ConditionsScrub TyphusArmsdoxycycline, Tigecycline (Tygacil)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jae Hyoung Im *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Sukbin Jang *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Young Ju SuhThe Biostatistics Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
DaeHyung LeeThe Biostatistics Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Jun LeeDivision of Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Osong, Republic of Korea.
Jonghyun KimDivision of Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Osong, Republic of Korea.
Se Ju LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyeon BaekDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Young Kyoung ParkTranslational Research Center, Institute for Bio-Medical and Translational Health Care, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
EunJi KimTranslational Research Center, Institute for Bio-Medical and Translational Health Care, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Myoung LeeTranslational Research Center, Institute for Bio-Medical and Translational Health Care, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Hye-Jin LeeTranslational Research Center, Institute for Bio-Medical and Translational Health Care, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Moon-Hyun ChungTranslational Research Center, Institute for Bio-Medical and Translational Health Care, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Wook HongDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
In-Gyu BaeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea. ttezebae@empas.com.
Jin-Soo LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea. ljinsoo16@gmail.com.

Funding

ROK National Institute of Health 022-ER-210400 and 2022-NI-036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDoxycycline is the standard treatment for scrub typhus, but evidence regarding parenteral alternatives remains limited in hospitalized patients. MAIN BODY: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial in Korea. Participants were enrolled and randomized from November 2022 through December 6, 2024. Adults aged 19 years or older hospitalized with clinically suspected scrub typhus were randomized to intravenous tigecycline or oral doxycycline; all randomized participants were subsequently laboratory-confirmed by PCR and/or seroconversion on paired serologic testing. Tigecycline was given as a 100 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg every 12 h for 5 days; doxycycline was given as 100 mg every 12 h for 7 days. The primary outcome was time from first dose to body temperature <37.3 °C sustained for at least 48 consecutive hours without antipyretics. Of 27 randomized patients, 24 were included in the per-protocol efficacy analysis. Median time to defervescence was shorter with tigecycline than with doxycycline (16.6 h [interquartile range, 11.0-32.0] vs. 55.0 h [24.0-64.3]; P = 0.0079). No recurrence requiring additional antirickettsial therapy occurred within 30 days. One patient in each group reported nausea.

conclusionsIn this preliminary randomized trial, intravenous tigecycline was associated with faster defervescence than oral doxycycline in clinically stable hospitalized adults with scrub typhus. These findings support further evaluation of tigecycline as an intravenous option in selected patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07513103.

Indexed as

DoxycyclineOrientia tsutsugamushiRandomized trialScrub typhusTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID42750051
PMCPMC13579949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.