ArticleTrials2026
Beyond antibiotic duration in acute cholangitis: system-level determinants after biliary drainage.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COBRA trial addresses whether antibiotic exposure can be safely reduced after adequate biliary drainage in acute cholangitis. We argue that antibiotic duration should be interpreted within the broader care pathway in which treatment is delivered, because source control, device management, host susceptibility, local microbiological ecology, and reliability of care processes may modify clinical outcomes. MAIN BODY: Drawing on the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions, we propose a system-level interpretation that complements, rather than replaces, the randomized comparison of antibiotic duration. A 24-month single-center quasi-experimental study in a gastroenterology unit, recently accepted for publication, provides hypothesis-generating support for this perspective: implementation of a standardized and traceable work-support intervention was associated with reductions in healthcare-associated infections, ward microbial pressure, and clinically expressed microbial burden. These findings do not establish causality or determine optimal antibiotic duration in acute cholangitis. To make care-pathway variability more explicit in future studies, we propose a Bundle Deviation Score based on six domains: timely diagnosis, timing of biliary drainage, adequacy of drainage and source control, antimicrobial strategy, device management, and standardized high-contact care. This contextual process measure could complement patient-centered outcome frameworks such as Desirability of Outcome Ranking by distinguishing treatment effects from variability in how care is delivered.
conclusionsThe COBRA trial provides important evidence for antimicrobial stewardship after biliary drainage. Its interpretation and transferability may be strengthened by measuring the reliability of the broader care pathway alongside antibiotic duration. Prospective validation is required before the proposed Bundle Deviation Score can be used for clinical or research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.