ArticleEcology2026
Causes of interspecific variation in avian migration distance.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Migration is an awe-inspiring behavior employed by a diverse suite of taxa throughout the animal kingdom. Avian migration is arguably the most well-known animal behavior and birds vary widely in how far they migrate, but the ecological mechanisms underlying interspecific variation in migration distance remain unclear. We developed a novel set of predictions deduced from seven mechanistic hypotheses proposed to explain interspecific variation in avian migration distance. We then used a Bayesian phylogenetic comparative analysis to test predictions from these seven hypotheses based on migration data and species traits from 446 species of migratory birds throughout the world based on data from animal-borne tracking technology. Body mass, seasonal food availability, and morphological/behavioral traits that improve flight efficiency explained significant interspecific variation in migration distance after controlling for absolute breeding latitude (which was positively correlated with migration distance). Specifically, we found migration distance was negatively correlated with body mass and seasonal food availability but positively correlated with hand-wing index (a measure of wing elongation and pointedness) and soaring flight. Moreover, the negative relationship between body mass and migration distance was not ubiquitous but rather depended on flight mode and intraspecific nonbreeding group size, such that species employing flapping flight during migration and those overwintering in smaller intraspecific groups had the strongest negative relationships between body mass and migration distance. Within group-living birds, smaller bodied species may gain a foraging or thermoregulatory advantage that shortens migration distances, while larger bodied species may gain an energetic advantage by using flock formations during migration that facilitates longer migrations to more suitable nonbreeding areas. From a life history perspective, maximum annual reproductive investment was negatively correlated with migration distance, while minimum annual reproductive investment and adult annual survival were not correlated with migration distance. Overall, our results support flight efficiency, food limitation, and thermoregulatory-based hypotheses as causes of interspecific variation in migration distances in birds. Our results also help to refine the numerous and often ambiguous mechanisms underlying the negative relationship between body size and migration distance and refute several hypotheses previously proposed to explain interspecific variation in avian migration distance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.