ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2026
Differential Responses of Tree Phyllosphere and Rhizosphere Microbiomes to Mycorrhizal Types and Planting Patterns in a Young Subtropical Forest Plantation.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EM) tree species are ubiquitous in subtropical forests and have distinctive root colonisation characteristics and leaf traits, resulting in differences in nutrient acquisition strategies and ecological functions. Here, we investigated the responses of bacteria, fungi and protists inhabiting tree phyllosphere and rhizosphere to tree mycorrhizal types (AM vs. EM) and planting patterns (single or double tree species planting with the same or different mycorrhizal type) in two seasons. Both leaf- and root-associated fungal richness and community composition were strongly structured by tree mycorrhizal type, whereas the bacterial community was primarily influenced by leaf habit. Protistan communities, however, exhibited weak host specificity and were dominated by stochastic processes, with seasonal variation acting as the main influencing factor. Overall, the phyllosphere microbiomes were jointly shaped by leaf traits and seasonal effects, but rhizosphere fungal communities were directly and indirectly regulated by tree mycorrhizal type via root nutrient and colonisation statuses. Altogether, tree phyllosphere and rhizosphere microbiomes differ from the interaction of mycorrhizal symbiosis, planting pattern and seasonality, with distinct ecological processes manipulating across bacteria, fungi and protists. This study highlights the necessity of integrating tree mycorrhizal types and above- and belowground habitats perspectives to better understand forest microbiomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.