Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42749975›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Salvage R0 Resection on Post-Recurrence Survival After Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Shintaro Hashimoto, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshio Shiraishi, Keisuke Noda, Mariko Yamashita, Hiroki Katayama, Yuma Takamura, Satoshi Mizoguchi, Tomohiro Obata, Daisuke Taniguchi and 13 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Shintaro HashimotoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-8754
Tetsuro TominagaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Toshio ShiraishiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Keisuke NodaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Mariko YamashitaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hiroki KatayamaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuma TakamuraDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Satoshi MizoguchiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tomohiro ObataDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Daisuke TaniguchiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ryoichiro DoiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Koichiro ShimoyamaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takuro MiyazakiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Makoto HisanagaDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Mitsutoshi IshiiDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Rika OnoDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takaaki NakatsukasaDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ryoichiro KamoharaDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masato ArakiDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yorihisa SumidaDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Akihiro NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takashi NonakaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. tnonaka@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
Keitaro MatsumotoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough pulmonary metastasectomy is an established treatment for colorectal cancer, recurrence is frequent. Repeat resection for hepatic recurrence is a recognized paradigm, but the clinical significance of salvage surgery for pulmonary recurrence remains less defined. This study evaluated recurrence patterns and the association with salvage R0 resection on post-recurrence survival using a time-dependent model.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 182 patients who achieved R0 resection at their initial pulmonary metastasectomy at two institutions between 2008 and 2022. Post-recurrence survival was calculated from the date of first recurrence. To account for immortal time bias, salvage R0 resection was modeled as a time-dependent covariate in a multivariable Cox model.

resultsRecurrence occurred in 76 patients (41.8%). Single-organ recurrence was observed in 80.3%, with the lung being the most frequent site (42.6%) among single-organ recurrences. Salvage R0 resection was achieved in 33 patients (43.4%), all of whom had single-organ recurrence. The 5-year post-recurrence survival was significantly higher in the salvage R0 group than in the non-R0 management group (53.0% vs. 14.6%; log-rank p < 0.001). In the time-dependent multivariable analysis, achieving salvage R0 resection was independently associated with improved post-recurrence survival (hazard ratio 0.359; 95% confidence interval 0.163-0.794; p = 0.011). Six patients remained recurrence-free for over 5 years after salvage R0 resection without systemic therapy.

conclusionsAchieving salvage R0 resection provides a significant survival benefit comparable to repeat hepatectomy outcomes. For patients with single-organ recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy, aggressive local intervention aimed at R0 resection should be considered a key therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerOligometastatic recurrencePost-recurrence survivalPulmonary metastasectomySalvage R0 resectionTime-dependent analysis

Identifiers

PMID42749975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.