ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
The effect of attentional loads on audiovisual integration: When spatial coincidence matters.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although prior studies have stated that the cross-modal interaction between simple and arbitrarily paired audiovisual (AV) stimuli can also be observed even when a person is instructed to ignore a particular modality, this may indicate that cross-modal integration takes place automatically, regardless of attentional control. Nevertheless, it is not clear whether attentional resources are actually required for cross-modal interactions between simple and meaningless AV stimuli to occur when the subject is instructed to ignore the auditory modality and whether attentional loads would have different influences on the cross-modal interactions between simple AV stimuli presented at the same position or at different spatial positions. In the present study, we adopted a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream as the distractor task to manipulate different attentional loads: no attentional load, a low attentional load, and a high attentional load. Additionally, spatial coincidence was controlled by presenting visual and auditory stimuli at the same or different locations. The results revealed that spatially congruent auditory stimuli can provide a particularly effective means of improving the ability to identify visual targets even when they occur in high-load conditions, whereas spatially incongruent auditory stimuli cannot enhance the ability to identify visual targets under high-load conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42749974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.