Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42749948›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2026

Satellite DNA evolution in Tytonidae (Aves: Strigiformes): dynamic repeat landscapes despite conserved karyotypes.

Felipe Lagreca Bitencourt, Gustavo Akira Toma, Luciano Cesar Pozzobon, Victor Cruz Cuervo, Ricardo Utsunomia, Maria Eduarda Gisloti-Ribeiro, Michel Octávio Fiorenço Capana, Raqueli Teresinha França, Marcelo de Bello Cioffi, Thales Renato Ochotorena de Freitas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Felipe Lagreca BitencourtLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 91509-900, Brazil.
Gustavo Akira TomaLaboratório de Citogenética Evolutiva, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 13565-905, Brazil.
Luciano Cesar PozzobonLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 91509-900, Brazil.
Victor Cruz CuervoLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 91509-900, Brazil.
Ricardo UtsunomiaFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru, SP, 13506-900, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda Gisloti-RibeiroFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru, SP, 13506-900, Brazil.
Michel Octávio Fiorenço CapanaFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru, SP, 13506-900, Brazil.
Raqueli Teresinha FrançaDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinária, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Marcelo de Bello CioffiLaboratório de Citogenética Evolutiva, Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 13565-905, Brazil.
Thales Renato Ochotorena de FreitasLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 91509-900, Brazil.
Rafael KretschmerLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 91509-900, Brazil. rafael.kretschmer@ufrgs.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Proc. 171459/2023-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Proc. 304068/2025-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Proc. 406747/2023-7Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Proc. 88887.177255/2025-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul Proc. 24/2551-0001269-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elevated chromosome numbers observed in Tytonidae relative to the putative ancestral avian karyotype suggest that lineage-specific chromosomal fissions may have played an important role in the evolutionary history of this family. Here, we provide the first cytogenetic characterization of the American barn owl (Tyto furcata) and performs a comparative repeatome analysis across members of the Tytonidae, including other two species, the Western barn owl (Tyto alba), and the Oriental bay owl (Phodilus badius). The karyotype of T. furcata showed a 2n = 92, closely resembling that previously described for T. alba, indicating a high degree of chromosomal conservation within Tytonidae. Although T. furcata and T. alba exhibit similar karyotypic organization, comparative repeatomic analyses revealed differences in their composition, including variation in satellite DNA (satDNA) repertoires and abundance. Eight satDNA families were identified in T. furcata, nine in T. alba, and 28 in P. badius, highlighting the dynamic evolution of repetitive sequences. Several satDNA families were shared between T. furcata and T. alba, whereas some appeared species-specific, supporting the library hypothesis of satDNA evolution. In P. badius, multiple satDNAs exhibited similarity to transposable elements, suggesting that mobile elements contributed to their diversification. Cytogenetic analyses demonstrated centromeric heterochromatin distribution in T. furcata, as well as a large heterochromatic W chromosome enriched in DNA repeats. The localization of satDNAs in centromeric regions and the apparent accumulation of repeats on the W chromosome reinforce the role of repetitive sequences in chromosome organization and sex chromosome differentiation. Together, these findings reveal repeatome diversification despite conserved macrochromosomal structure and provide new insights into genome evolution and chromosomal dynamics in birds.

Indexed as

DNA, SatelliteEvolution, MolecularKaryotypeStrigiformesAnimalsHeterochromatinKaryotypingPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA, SatelliteHeterochromatinFISH mappingGenome organizationHeterochromatinKaryotype evolutionRepetitive DNAStrigiformes

Identifiers

PMID42749948
PMCPMC13582039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.