ArticleCurrent microbiology2026
Pathogenicity Difference Between Male and Female mice by Recent SARS-CoV-2/2025.
Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Covid-19 pandemic was caused by a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and caused a tremendous burden to humans including thousands of deaths. SARS-CoV-2 still causes the respiratory diseases to humans annually. It is known that the pathological outcomes may be different from sexes of humans infected with viral diseases. Here, we studied the pathological difference between females and males infected with the recent SARS-CoV-2 in 6-week-old hACE2-trangenic mouse models. When female and male mice were intranasally infected with the recent SARS-CoV-2/2025, no mortality was observed in both infected female and male mice. However, the infected female mice suffered from more body-weight loss than the infected male mice with higher viral titers in the lungs. The infected male mice produced higher amount of the immune-stimulatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ, and anti-apoptotic genes such as BCL2 and Bcl-XL in the lungs than those of the infected female mice. Taken together, it seems that the infected male mice with the recent SARS-CoV-2/2025 could suffer from milder clinical signs than the infected female mice because of the increased expression of immune-enhancing cytokines and anti-apoptotic genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42749897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.