ArticleNature medicine2026
Sex-specific biological aging clocks across organs and omics.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shaping the future of early-onset colorectal cancer prevention.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differentially shapes aging, neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, most biological aging clocks (artificial intelligence-predicted age minus chronological age) were trained on sex-pooled samples and implicitly assume sex invariance.Here we developed 38 sex-specific biological aging clocks across 15 organ systems. We first demonstrate the importance of sex-stratified training for constructing sex-specific healthy normative references and then reveal marked divergence between female and male clocks. Key genetic parameters and Mendelian randomization results indicate that organ-specific aging liability and its relationships to cardiometabolic, endocrine and mental traits are configured differently in females and males. Proteomic analyses identify distinct, organ-resolved synaptic, immune, vascular and metabolic networks that differentially track female and male biological aging. In longitudinal survival analyses, sex-specific clocks predict whole-body systemic diseases and all-cause mortality in a sex-dependent and organ-dependent manner. Further analyses reveal sex-dependent associations between the brain aging clock and cognitive decline trajectory during a preclinical AD clinical trial. Sex-stratified clocks may offer distinct value by defining biological age against sex-appropriate normative references and revealing sex-dependent genetic, molecular and clinical signatures that pooled models may obscure. Meanwhile, sex-pooled and sex-interaction approaches remain valuable, as human aging and disease also share fundamental biological similarities between females and males. Together, these findings reveal sex-specific biological aging signatures in aging, AD and systemic health, highlighting the need for explicitly sex-stratified modeling approaches.
Identifiers
42749890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.