Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42749862›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2026

A multi-site benchmarking framework for scalable extraction of geriatric care constructs from electronic health records.

Sunyang Fu, Min Ji Kwak, Jaerong Ahn, Qiuhao Lu, Zhiyi Yue, Nan Wang, Huipeng Liu, Grace Giles, Alexa Cumming, Keziah M Thomas and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Sunyang FuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Min Ji KwakMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Jaerong AhnMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Qiuhao LuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Zhiyi YueSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Nan WangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Huipeng LiuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Grace GilesMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Alexa CummingMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Keziah M ThomasMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Shreyans SanghviMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Jiang JunMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Ming HuangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Xiaoyang RuanMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Andrew WenMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Liwei WangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, TX, USA.
Erin HommelUniversity of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA.
Yanshan WangUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lichao SunLehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Huiwen XuEmory University, Atlanta, GAa, USA.
Chan Mi ParkBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer St SauverMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jeffrey S WefelThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nahid RianonKaiser Permanente, Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Dae Hyun KimBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Boston, MA, USA.
Hongfang LiuDell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. hongfang.liu@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
ReCARDO: Using Real-World Data to Derive Common Data Elements for Alzheimer's Disease and AD-Related Dementias Research Through Ontological InnovationU24AG098157 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Zoe Arvanitakis, Yong Chen · 2025 to 2026
$9.8M
NIDUS III: Advanced-Stage Development and Utilization of the NIDUS Research Infrastructure to Advance Interdisciplinary Aging Research inDeliriumR33AG071744 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI John W. Devlin, Esther Seunghee Oh · 2021 to 2026
$4.7M
Facilitate Observational Studies of Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias Using Ontology and Natural Language ProcessingR01AG072799 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HONGFANG LIU, Cui Tao · 2025 to 2026
$1.7M
Mid-Career Mentoring Award For Patient-Oriented Research in Frailty and Health OutcomesK24AG073527 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI Dae Hyun Kim · 2022 to 2026
$862k
electronic Strategies for Tailored Exercise to Prevent FallS (eSTEPS).R61AG068926 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DYKES, PATRICIA C, LATHAM, NANCY K · 2020 to 2021
$494k
Computational phenotyping of cancer-related cognitive impairment in older adultsK01AG088452 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Sunyang Fu · 2025 to 2026
$221k
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas RR230020NIA NIH HHS K01 AG088452NIA NIH HHS K01AG088452NIA NIH HHS K24 AG073527NIA NIH HHS K24AG073527NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NIA NIH HHS P30AG024832NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072799NIA NIH HHS R01AG072799NIA NIH HHS R33 AG071744NIA NIH HHS R61 AG068926NIA NIH HHS U24 AG098157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms for detecting geriatric conditions are largely limited to domain-specific models that fail to capture the interdependent, multidimensional nature of comprehensive geriatric assessment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a comprehensive, scalable, and robust information extraction framework to identify Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms-related data elements from unstructured electronic health record (EHR) text across multiple health systems. Using a team science approach grounded in the TRUST framework, we annotated pooled clinical notes from four health systems to produce a gold-standard dataset of 41 CGA- and 4Ms-related geriatric care data elements. Three information extraction approaches were implemented and evaluated: an in-context learning generative large language model (GPT-4o), a hybrid heuristic-LLM model (MedAgingIE), and an instruction-tuned open-source lightweight model (Qwen2-7B-Instruct). Performance was assessed on a blinded test set using macro- and micro-averaged metrics. GPT-4o achieved a macro F1-score of 0.56 and micro F1-score of 0.87; MedAgingIE achieved 0.55 and 0.92; and Qwen2-7B-Instruct achieved 0.30 and 0.81, respectively. MedAgingIE demonstrated the strongest consistency between precision and recall, while GPT-4o showed superior sensitivity for diverse, context-rich geriatric concepts. These findings highlight key trade-offs among symbolic, generative, and instruction-tuned approaches for CGA and 4Ms phenotyping, suggesting that hybrid heuristic-LLM methods offer interpretability and stability, whereas large language models provide greater adaptability for complex clinical narratives.

Identifiers

PMID42749862
PMCPMC13582951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.