Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Jie Zhang *Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-2313
Meiling Jin *State Key Laboratory of Quantitative Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-801X
Dan RaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Ming WangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jing WangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0009-0000-0245-6130
Canjie MaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Lanlan RaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yanzhen MoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Baohua LiuGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. ppliew@szu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-1599-8059
Zimei WangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. wangzm@szu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7288-3821
Ying AoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Carson International Cancer Center, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. aoyingszu@szu.edu.cn.ORCID 0009-0004-4091-6088
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Chronic activation of the cGAS-STING pathway drives inflammaging and cellular senescence. Although nuclear envelope (NE) barrier failure leading to cytoplasmic chromatin leakage is a key trigger, the molecular mechanisms governing STING activity at the NE during aging remain poorly understood. Here, we identify lamin A/C (LMNA) as a critical NE scaffold that orchestrates STING regulation by recruiting both STING and Casein Kinase 2 (CK2α). We demonstrate that LMNA facilitates the phosphorylation of STING at Ser366 by CK2α, which promotes STING turnover and restricts its accumulation, thereby attenuating pathway activation and mitigating senescence in myeloid cells as well as systemic aging. Strikingly, pharmacologic STING inhibition in vivo robustly rescues progeroid phenotypes-including loss of bone density and multi-tissue senescence-and extends lifespan in progeroid mouse models. Moreover, H-151 treatment also ameliorates the premature aging phenotypes induced by myeloid-specific CK2α ablation. In contrast, constitutive STING ablation yields limited survival benefits, revealing that controlled attenuation of STING signaling, rather than complete elimination, drives therapeutic efficacy. Our findings establish the LMNA-CK2-STING axis as a key biochemical mechanism that suppresses innate immune activation at the NE, offering a promising strategy for ameliorating aging and progeroid pathologies.
Indexed as
AgingCasein Kinase IIMembrane ProteinsAnimalsCellular SenescencecGAS-STING Signaling PathwayHumansLamin Type AMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNuclear EnvelopePhosphorylationProgeriaSignal TransductionCasein Kinase IILamin Type ALmna protein, mouseMembrane ProteinsSting1 protein, mouseSTING Protein
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
CK2α restriction of STING accumulation underlies systemic aging. · full record | OpenQuestion