Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42749728›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Poromechanical toughening in tensile fracture of saturated solids.

Antoine Guggisberg, Mehana Allache, Philipp Braun, Marie Violay, Mathias Lebihain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antoine GuggisbergLaboratory of Experimental Rock Mechanics (LEMR), ENAC, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. antoine.guggisberg@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-7867
Mehana AllacheNavier, ENPC, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Université Gustave Eiffel, CNRS, Champs-sur-Marne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0565-161X
Philipp BraunNavier, ENPC, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Université Gustave Eiffel, CNRS, Champs-sur-Marne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-5018
Marie ViolayLaboratory of Experimental Rock Mechanics (LEMR), ENAC, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7402-8263
Mathias LebihainNavier, ENPC, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Université Gustave Eiffel, CNRS, Champs-sur-Marne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-4701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture in fluid-saturated porous solids is governed not only by solid mechanics but also by fluid flow within the pore space. In systems ranging from geomaterials to biological tissues, deformation in the near-tip region perturbs pore pressure and thereby alters crack growth. Yet these pore-fluid effects have largely been inferred rather than directly observed. Here, we perform in situ pore-pressure measurements during controlled tensile rupture of a water-saturated microporous cement. We demonstrate that a propagating crack generates a localized underpressure ahead of its tip, providing a direct experimental signature of poromechanical coupling. The amplitude of this transient pressure drop scales with the square root of crack velocity, in agreement with poroelastic theory. This underpressure reduces the effective stress near the crack tip, leading to a coupled mechanical response: the apparent fracture energy doubles across the tested velocity range while the fracture process zone shrinks by half. Our findings reveal poromechanical coupling as a rate-dependent control on fracture in saturated porous materials, governed by effective stress changes induced by competing fluid diffusion and crack advance.

Identifiers

PMID42749728
PMCPMC13582804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.