ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2026
Evaluation of serum MicroRNAs and HCV Core antigen as predictive and diagnostic biomarkers for chronic hepatitis C management in Iraqi patients: comparison with PCR-based detection.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a growing health issue in Iraq, emphasizing the necessity to use precise diagnostic and predictive biomarkers to guide disease management. Although PCR-based detection of HCV viral load is highly sensitive, it is expensive and requires sophisticated facilities.
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum microRNA-122 (miR-122), microRNA-221 (miR-221), and HCV core antigen (HCV core Ag) compared with PCR-based detection of HCV viral load, to determine their predictive value for treatment response, and to monitor their changes during direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective study, 50 treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and 50 healthy controls were recruited from Al-Ramadi Teaching Hospital and affiliated private clinics from January 2025 to December 2025. Each patient was assessed longitudinally at baseline, week 8, and week 12 of Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir therapy, giving 150 patient-time observations. HCV RNA was measured using the GeneXpert system, HCV core antigen was measured using the Abbott Architect HCV Ag assay, and serum miR-122 and miR-221 were quantified using a separate RT-qPCR platform and normalized to miR-191.
resultsSerum miR-122 had excellent diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.92), with sensitivity and specificity of 89.3% and 86.0%, respectively. HCV core antigen demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.87). A combined model of miR-122 and HCV core antigen yielded superior diagnostic accuracy compared with either marker alone (AUC = 0.95). Baseline composite score predicted EOT virological response with good accuracy (AUC = 0.84). Significant correlations were found between HCV viral load and each of serum miR-122 (r = 0.78) and HCV core antigen (r = 0.82).
conclusionSerum miR-122 and HCV core antigen are clinically relevant complementary biomarkers for the diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C and for predicting on-treatment virological response in Iraqi patients. Although the microRNAs are themselves quantified by RT-qPCR, these findings support wider implementation of miRNA- and HCV core antigen-based testing as lower-cost complements, and in the case of HCV core antigen a potential alternative, to HCV RNA PCR for diagnosis and treatment monitoring in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.