Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42749448›Full record

ReviewJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2026

Ancient DNA as a temporal lens: reconstructing evolution, migration, and disease dynamics.

Abang Ulrich Akwo, Julius Luvanga, Ketonze Valademy Ketu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abang Ulrich AkwoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovations, Nairobi, Kenya; Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon. Electronic address: abangulrich@gmail.com.
Julius LuvangaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovations, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ketonze Valademy KetuDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancient DNA (aDNA) has transformed evolutionary biology and anthropology by providing direct, chronologically validated genetic evidence over millennia. This review synthesizes significant findings from the paleogenomic era (2010-2025), demonstrating how ancient DNA has resolved persistent debates across four interconnected themes: (i) human migration and admixture, revealing complex population transitions from archaic hominins to Holocene expansions; (ii) adaptation, tracking allele frequency changes during domestication and selection; (iii) pathogen history, clarifying the origins of pandemics and the evolution of microbiomes; and (iv) ecosystem dynamics, identifying extinction causes through sedimentary DNA and conservation genomics. We contend that scientific rigor and ethical stewardship are crucial for accurate conclusions, given ancient DNA study requires the destructive collection of culturally significant remains. This review argues that continued advancement will depend on the integration of genomic data with archaeological, isotopic, and proteomic evidence, and highlights the necessity for equitable involvement with descendant communities. By conceptualizing the past as a continuum of dynamic processes rather than static events, ancient DNA provides a revised historical narrative and insights relevant to contemporary concerns in conservation, health, and social justice.

Indexed as

EvolutionGenomicPaleogenomicPopulation

Identifiers

PMID42749448
PMCPMC13449781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.