ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2026
Machine learning-driven identification of PIM2 kinase inhibitors through QSAR modeling and molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase PIM2 is a critical regulator of cell proliferation, survival, and tumor progression and represents an attractive therapeutic target for several cancers. In this study, an integrated machine learning-guided computational pipeline was developed to identify potential PIM2 inhibitors by combining quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling, virtual screening, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and pharmacokinetic prediction. Bioactivity data for PIM2 inhibitors were retrieved from the ChEMBL database, yielding 5953 compounds. After data cleaning, structural standardization, and removal of duplicates and invalid entries, a curated dataset of 1584 compounds was obtained for QSAR modeling. To address dataset imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied before model development. Twelve molecular fingerprint descriptors were generated and used to construct 180 QSAR models using five machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). Among these models, the Random Forest-fingerprint model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving a mean R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.