ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2026
Evaluating the effect of SNPs located on some biofilm genes on their protein function and structure in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumonia isolates.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of biofilm-associated SNPs (previously identified) on protein structure and function, we employed a suite of bioinformatics tools. SIFT, Mupro, INPS-3D, and NCBI Conserved Domain Search were utilized to analyze changes in function, stability, secondary structure, phi/psi angles, and Relative Solvent Accessibility (RSA). Furthermore, SwissDock and molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to compare free energy, RMSF, polarity, flexibility, and molecular contacts between wild-type and mutant proteins. In silico analysis indicated that mutations in quorum-sensing (lasI, rhlI) and biofilm-associated genes significantly impact bacterial biofilm formation. Specifically, SIFT and Mupro predicted that lasI/rhlI mutations D39N (0.01/0.2) and D44N (0.5) impair signaling molecule synthesis. Furthermore, the S32N substitution in ndvB was predicted by INPS-3D to alter secondary structure (β-sheet to coil) and torsion angles (ϕ: -99 to 118; ψ: -94 to 5), likely disrupting protein function. Additionally, the R292A mutation in tssc1 was predicted to impact protein stability (SIFT: 0.01; Mupro: -0.9) and increase burial (RSA 37% to 23%, helix to coil). A frame-shift mutation in tssc1 was also identified, suggesting further modulation of biofilm production. Regarding with docking results, D44N in the rhII gene showed a slight change ΔΔG values from -7 to -7.2 and a change in polarity from 16 to 14, however, molecular dynamic simulation showed significant increase in RSMF value from 1.5 to 3.5 and increase the flexibility in mutant compared with wild type which reflects the importance of this SNP in changing the function of the protein mediating biofilm formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.