ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2026
Sex differences in cartilage anatomy, imaging & treatment response.
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review findings on sex differences in cartilage anatomy, cartilage imaging, and treatment in osteoarthritis, based on an invited presentation held at the International Workshop of Osteoarthritis Imaging (IWOAI) 2025.
designA non-systematic literature search (Pubmed) and consultations with experts. Additionally, comparative radiographic joint space width (JSW) and femorotibial cartilage thickness data were obtained from 2396 knees (from 2004 male and female Osteoarthritis Initiative participants), covering radiographic joint space narrowing (JSN) grades 0-3. Sex differences in JSW and cartilage morphology were related to those of other articular and periarticular tissues in qualitative form.
resultsMen displayed greater JSW and femorotibial cartilage thickness than women. For JSW, but not for cartilage thickness, sex differences disappeared with greater joint space narrowing (JSN) grade. The sex difference in cartilage thickness was maintained after adjusting for relevant covariates, e.g. body height. These morphological findings differ from those in cartilage transverse relaxation time (T2) and from other (peri‑) articular tissues. Preliminary findings suggest that men may respond more strongly to surgical and anabolic pharmacological cartilage therapy.
conclusionsBetween and within species, large differences exist in the heterogeneity of morphological traits. Sexual dimorphism can be male- or female biased in different species; within humans some musculoskeletal characteristics are greater in men and others in women. Men display "genuinely" greater JSW, cartilage thickness, and joint surface areas than women, the latter potentially contributing to a lower joint pressure and lower incidence in knee osteoarthritis than in women. Sex-differences in cartilage treatment response deserve deeper exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.