ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Recent advances in application of venous superdrainage in perforator flaps].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the application, clinical value, and current limitations of venous superdrainage in perforator flap reconstruction. Methods: The literature on venous superdrainage was reviewed, focusing on distal necrosis and venous outflow impairment in perforator flaps, the characteristics of the superficial venous system, the principles of venous superdrainage, and its application in different reconstruction sites. Results: Venous superdrainage, by providing additional venous outflow channels to divert congested blood and reduce venous pressure, can significantly increase venous outflow of the flap (from approximately 4 mL/minute to 13.9 mL/minute in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps). In breast reconstruction, selective anastomosis of the superficial inferior epigastric vein reduces venous congestion and related complications; in the distal lower extremity, prospective comparative studies of venous-supercharged propeller flaps and distally based sural flaps have shown significant reductions in venous congestion and distal necrosis. However, the benefits are influenced by individual venous anatomy and multiple factors, and identification of high-risk configurations and selection of target veins remain non-standardized. Conclusion: Venous superdrainage has potential clinical value in certain high-risk configurations. However, its indications for prophylactic use, selection of target veins, and standardized implementation protocols require further clarification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.