ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
Structure-informed theoretical modeling defines principles governing avidity in bivalent protein interactions.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In signaling cascades, signaling proteins often encode multiple domains or motifs, which presents the possibility for avidity-where multivalent binding drastically increases interaction strength and duration. However, predicting and validating multivalent interactions that interact with avidity is a challenge. Here, we integrate mechanistic modeling, structure-based analysis, and experimental approaches as a framework for defining the conditions under which avidity plays a role. We explore the tandem SH2 domain family of interactions with bisphosphorylated partners as a multivalent archetype, which encompasses key secondary messengers in tyrosine kinase signaling networks. Theoretical modeling suggests that maximum avidity occurs with closely spaced tyrosine phosphorylation sites combined with moderate monovalent affinities-exactly around the innate range of SH2 domain affinity-or with phosphorylation sites separated by sufficiently flexible linkers. Surprisingly, despite sequence diversity, structure-based analysis showed relatively conserved three-dimensional spacing between SH2 domains across all tandem SH2 families, which we corroborate experimentally, suggesting evolutionary optimization for avidity interactions. The combination of structure-based analysis of domain spacing with available monovalent experimental data, along with iterative experimental refinement of biophysical parameters, appears able to identify high-affinity interactions of tandem SH2 domain recruitment to the epidermal growth factor receptor C-terminal tail. Using these principles, we extended bivalent predictions into the full phosphoproteome space and structural parameterization of other partners of SH2 domain binding, providing resources and methods for more rapid expansion of bivalent analysis. These approaches lay the groundwork for larger utility in multivalent prediction and testing to help better understand protein interactions that drive cell signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.