Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42748896›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026

Accelerating discovery: Transformative clinical trial models in neuro-oncology.

Amy J Wisdom, Rifaquat Rahman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy J WisdomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rifaquat RahmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: rrahman@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in neuro-oncology drug development has been slower than the pace of biological discovery, and trial design is increasingly recognized as a central contributor to this gap. Traditional trial paradigms, largely developed for systemic malignancies, face distinct challenges when applied to central nervous system (CNS) tumors - among them intratumoral heterogeneity, rapid clinical progression, limited tissue access, and the evolving molecular classification of gliomas. These biological and logistical realities have strained the assumptions underlying conventional phase II and III designs, and there is growing consensus that new approaches are needed. This review examines a framework of emerging trial models that better align clinical testing with the realities of CNS tumors. Master protocol designs enable simultaneous evaluation of multiple therapies within shared, molecularly informed infrastructures, supporting precision medicine approaches and improving efficiency. Bayesian adaptive frameworks allow trials to learn during conduct, reallocating patients toward promising therapies and incorporating emerging biological data in real time. Beyond efficacy assessment, trials can serve as active discovery platforms embedding longitudinal tissue sampling, window-of-opportunity designs, and multi-omic profiling to interrogate CNS drug penetrance, pharmacodynamic target engagement, and treatment-induced tumor evolution directly in human disease. Decentralized trial models and artificial intelligence offer additional tools to broaden access, improve enrollment, and reduce operational burden. Reimagining clinical trials as dynamic, biologically integrated, learning-based systems rather than static tests of individual agents is essential to accelerate therapeutic progress in neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

Clinical trial designDrug developmentNeuro-oncology

Identifiers

PMID42748896
PMCPMC13599630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.