ReviewBrazilian journal of physical therapy2026
When evidence fails in real life: Rethinking sports injury rehabilitation and prevention.
Review in Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional models of sports injury prevention and rehabilitation have largely relied on linear, reductionist frameworks that emphasize isolated risk factors and standardized interventions. Although these approaches have advanced the field of sports, they have shown limited capacity to explain real-world injury patterns or to guide effective, context-sensitive clinical practice. Emerging perspectives grounded in complexity science, contemporary interpretations of evidence-based practice, and dynamic biopsychosocial thinking offer more comprehensive ways to understand and manage sports injuries.
objectiveTo critically examine the historical and conceptual foundations of sports injury prevention and rehabilitation, clarify misconceptions surrounding evidence-based practice, and discuss the limitations of reductionist applications of the biopsychosocial model. The goal is to propose a more integrated, complexity-informed framework to support patient-centered and contextually relevant physical therapy practice. DISCUSSION: The current sports injury literature shows that these injuries arise from nonlinear, dynamic interactions among biological, psychological, and social determinants, challenging the adequacy of linear causality and one-size-fits-all interventions. Evidence-based practice is often misinterpreted as a hierarchy of study designs rather than as an integrative process that combines research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values within real-world constraints. Similarly, the biopsychosocial model is frequently applied in a fragmented manner, treating its components as separate rather than interdependent. Integrating complexity thinking with a fully realized EBP framework and a dynamic biopsychosocial perspective enables clinicians to navigate uncertainty, tailor interventions, and deliver care that aligns with athletes' lived realities. This approach strengthens clinical reasoning and supports more effective, patient-centered rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.