ArticlePloS one2026
A freshwater resilient and connected network to sustain biodiversity under a changing climate.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last century, the integrity of streams and lakes in the U.S. has deteriorated. Our river networks are fragmented by thousands of dams hindering movement and adaptation. Water diversions, groundwater withdrawals, and habitat degradation have depleted flows and altered hydrology. Now climate change is altering precipitation patterns and temperature regimes, sending freshwater species into rapid decline. To address this crisis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC), working with 66 freshwater conservationists representing 44 states, mapped the characteristics that impart resilience to freshwater systems and identified a representative network that, if conserved and restored, could theoretically sustain the nation's aquatic biodiversity. Key attributes of resilience included connectivity, condition, water availability, and naturalness of flow. Each attribute was assessed individually, and the results were combined into a resilience score for every small watershed (HUC-12). We overlaid the results with 91 spatial freshwater biodiversity assessments to identify a network that meets criteria for representation, resilience, connectivity, and biodiversity: what we have termed a 'freshwater resilient and connected network.' The network covers 35% of the conterminous U.S. and separates into 19% scoring as resilient and 16% as restorable (i.e., average resilience with one below-average factor). It includes 67% of recognized biodiversity areas, 75% of free-flowing rivers, and at least 30% of every freshwater ecoregion except one. Current conservation of the network distributes as 6% protected and resilient, 2% protected and restorable, 13% unprotected and resilient, and 14% unprotected and restorable. The results form a foundation for sustaining diverse and adaptive freshwater systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.