SynthesisPloS one2026
Mathematical skills in deaf and hard-of-hearing children: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMathematical competencies are essential for both academic achievement and everyday functioning. Research investigating mathematical skills in deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) individuals has produced heterogeneous findings, indicating domain-specific performance patterns and the influence of linguistic and cognitive factors. Recent evidence further suggests that these differences may emerge early in development. This systematic review aims to evaluate mathematical competencies in DHH individuals and to contextualize their mathematical profile in relation to developmental dyscalculia.
methodsA systematic review of observational studies was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were selected based on the PICOS framework, including participants under 18 years of age with congenital or acquired hearing loss. Comparisons involved hearing peers with or without specific learning disorders, and outcomes were based on direct assessments of mathematical abilities or related cognitive processes. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science between March 31 and April 3, 2026, including all studies published up to the search date. In addition, relevant studies were identified through manual screening of reference lists. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, results were synthesised narratively rather than through meta-analysis.
resultsThe twelve included studies showed substantial variability in mathematical performance among DHH individuals. Lower achievement was more consistently observed in tasks with high linguistic demands, such as word problem solving, measurement, and mathematical reasoning, whereas procedural and visually supported tasks were relatively preserved. Evidence from both preschool and school-aged populations suggests that these differences may emerge early in development and remain observable across different developmental stages. Linguistic proficiency and access to a fully accessible language emerged as key factors associated with mathematical outcomes. Additional sources of variability included educational setting, communication modality, age of language acquisition, and hearing-related characteristics. Overall methodological quality was generally characterized by moderate methodological concerns, most commonly related to limited control of confounding variables, incomplete reporting of measurement validity, and small sample sizes.
conclusionMathematical difficulties in deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) individuals appear to be domain-specific rather than global and appear to be associated with linguistic access and educational experiences. Evidence from both preschool and school-aged populations suggests that these differences may emerge early in development and remain evident across studies involving different age groups. These findings highlight the importance of considering language-related factors in both the assessment and instruction of mathematics in DHH learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.