ArticlePloS one2026
Does rural talent cultivation enhance farmers' social capital? Evidence from the 'One Village, One University Student' project.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using the One Village, One University Student (OVOUS) project as an example and drawing on survey data from 2,552 farmers in 12 counties (county-level cities/districts) in Jiangxi Province, China, this study employs an endogenous switching probit (ESP) model to empirically examine whether participation in rural revitalization talent-training programs enhances farmers' social capital. The results show that: (1) participation significantly increases farmers' bonding social capital by 6.8 percentage points (ATT = 0.068, SE = 0.002), suggesting that systematic education not only strengthens individual capabilities but also facilitates the expansion of social networks; (2) correspondence education yields a stronger social-capital-promoting effect than distance education, with estimated effects of 8.1 and 5.8 percentage points, respectively, highlighting the potential role of face-to-face interaction and repeated social engagement in enhancing farmers' bonding social capital; and (3) older farmers experience slightly larger gains in bonding social capital than younger farmers (10.8 versus 10.5 percentage points), and female farmers experience substantially larger gains than male farmers (12.8 versus 5.1 percentage points), indicating stronger marginal returns among groups with relatively weaker social networks. Overall, the findings reveal that rural talent policies generate important spillover value by fostering social capital accumulation. This implies that future policy design should jointly consider the dual effects on human capital and social capital and, in light of group heterogeneity, improve the matching mechanisms between training modalities and target participants to enhance policy precision and overall effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.